PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re. Ontological Uncertainty
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000, 10:56 pm, "Gunnar Tomasson"
<tomasson@xxxxxxxx> wrote, under the title,
"Re. Ontological Uncertainty",
>Considering
>(a) that the starting point in our "study of the nature of reality" is the
>axiomatic constructs of theoretical physics; and
This is an axiom that not everyone would concede. While this is
the source for an important collection of constraints on social
evolution, it is only in economics that proceding from those
constructs is accepted as a normal practice, and even in
economics, these constructs are developed as if the starting
point was an existing human society.
Virtually,
Bruce McFarling, Shortland, NSW
ecbm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread context:
- Re: Re. Ontological Uncertainty, (continued)
- Re: Re. Ontological Uncertainty,
Harry Veeder Fri 15 Dec 2000, 21:36 GMT
- Re: Re. Ontological Uncertainty,
David Dequech Sun 17 Dec 2000, 18:03 GMT
- Re: Re. Ontological Uncertainty,
Bruce McFarling Sun 17 Dec 2000, 18:03 GMT
- Re. Ontological Uncertainty,
Bruce McFarling Sun 17 Dec 2000, 18:03 GMT
- RE: Re. Ontological Uncertainty,
Forstater, Mathew Mon 18 Dec 2000, 15:52 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]