PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Uncertainty
Bruce,
Here I think you give away too much.
While ontological uncertainty is sufficient
in the sense that it suffices, in the absence
of mystical revelation, to generate epistemological
uncertainty, it is the latter that is relevant
(whatever its source).
Alan Isaac
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Bruce McFarling wrote:
> Actually, EITHER epistemological or ontological uncertainty are
> sufficient -- when one, the other, or both are important factors,
> then true uncertainty is present in an important way.
- Thread context:
- Re: uncertainty, (continued)
- Re: uncertainty,
John Gelles Sun 17 Dec 2000, 18:03 GMT
- Message not available
- RE: uncertainty,
James Juniper Thu 14 Dec 2000, 15:53 GMT
- Re: Uncertainty,
Bruce McFarling Thu 14 Dec 2000, 15:53 GMT
- re: uncertainty,
David Dequech Thu 14 Dec 2000, 15:53 GMT
- Re: uncertainty,
Harry Veeder Fri 15 Dec 2000, 14:25 GMT
- RE: uncertainty,
Forstater, Mathew Fri 15 Dec 2000, 14:25 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]