PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Article from THE GUARDIAN, September 18, 2000
The following article appeared in the GUARDIAN on September 18, 2000
Commentary
Keynes, you should be alive this hour
Paul Davidson
Guardian
Monday September 18, 2000
John Maynard Keynes, one of the
founding fathers of the World
Bank and the IMF, once toasted
economists as "trustees, not of
civilisation, but of the possibilities
of civilisation."
As the bank and the fund begin their
protest-ridden annual
meeting in Prague, it is worth asking
whether today's
economists are living up to Keynes'
dictum. We have seen that
the idea that planned economies
provide an economic utopia
where civilisation can flourish is
nonsense. Nevertheless, the
Thatcher claim that liberalised
financial markets are always
efficient and are mankind's only hope
for economic and social
progress has also seen to be wanting.
Many have been searching for a "third
way" occupying the
middle ground in the place of the
polar views of planning vs
laissez-faire. This "third way" hunt
has become the conventional
wisdom for Britain's "New Labour" and
Germany's "New Social
Democrats". Having apparently seen the
writing on the wall,
Gordon Brown is encouraging some
contingency economic
thinking. His Royal Economic Society
lecture earlier this year
and the fact that the Treasury has
started to hold private
seminars titled "Keynes in the 21st
century" indicates that this
Labour government's third way includes
a search for resurrecting
Keynes' civilising economic principles
and policies.
Unfortunately, Keynes' argument for
remedying the serious flaws
of our entrepreneurial economy without
destroying the spirit of
enterprise or the promotion of a
civilized society is not well
understood by the Bank of England or
the Treasury.
If Keynes was alive today and the
chancellor invited him to
address one of the Treasury's private
seminars, Keynes would
stress the following points.
? The "outstanding faults" of an
entrepreneurial society are its
failure to provide sustained full
employment and its arbitrary and
inequitable distribution of income and
wealth.
? The failure to provide sustainable
full employment is not due to
supply-side market imperfections such
as monopolies or rigid
wages. Policies designed to increase
wage-price and exchange
rate flexibility while liberalising
financial markets may well
exacerbate unemployment.
? Government's responsibility is to
"exercise a guiding influence"
on private spending decisions to
ensure that there is never a
persistent lack of effective demand.
Government operating
budgets should be balanced. If private
spending fails to produce
full employment (especially if
entrepreneurial exuberance fades),
government should run a capital
account deficit to employ
resources to produce, with the
cooperation of private initiative,
additional productive facilities.
? Unemployed workers and excessive
idle capacity is a "public
scandal of wasted resources". The
ultimate cause of such a
scandal is nested in the human
weakness of speculation and an
obsession with liquidity. A necessary
condition for solving the
unemployment problem involves damping
destabilising financial
speculation to assure orderly
financial markets and providing
cheaply all the liquidity that
entrepreneurs can use.
? Liquidity is a double-edged sword.
The good cutting edge is
that by providing an orderly market
where financial assets can
be readily resold encourages savers to
provide funding to
entrepreneurial investments. Without
liquidity, the risk of funding
investments as a minority owner would
be intolerable. The "bad"
edge of the sword is that if a strong
bearish view develops, the
resulting demand for liquidity impedes
the production of new
investments even when real resources
are available to be
employed.
In November, Lord (Robert) Skidelsky's
third volume of his
biography of Keynes, Fighting For
Britain, will be published. I
advise the chancellor to read
Skidelsky's biography to see how
these five principles were used by
Keynes to develop policies
that promoted the possibilities of
civilization for postwar Britain
and the global community.
Paul Davidson is Holly chair of
excellence in political economy
at the University of Tennessee
Paul Davidson
Holly Chair of Excellence in Political Economy
Editor, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics
Economics Department - 523 SMC
University of Tennessee
Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-0550
phone # (865) 974-4221
fax # (865) 974-1686
home fax # (865) 577-7747
http://econ.bus.utk.edu/Davidson.html
- Thread context:
- The "Old" and the "New" Economics,
William B. Ryan Tue 19 Sep 2000, 22:20 GMT
- Re. an enquiry,
Gunnar Tomasson Tue 19 Sep 2000, 18:23 GMT
- position opening at University of Redlands in Southern Cal,
CNiggle Tue 19 Sep 2000, 16:20 GMT
- Oil, Euro and Liquidity,
ÁÎ×Ó¹â Henry C.K.Liu ¹ù¤l¥ú Tue 19 Sep 2000, 14:08 GMT
- Article from THE GUARDIAN, September 18, 2000,
Paul Davidson Tue 19 Sep 2000, 14:05 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]