PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Disenchantment with the mainstream.
If mainstream economics, and far-out
economics (in search of models that deal
with complex natural systems including
the weather and biological complexity,
as well as, artificial human economics
that generates price data with less useful
meaning than many will admit), are both
dazzled by a priori logic, then they will
easily lose touch with real pain. And, at
least the mainstream has done this.
This loss of feeling for human pain is partly
because they fail to measure the concrete
living conditions of individual people, and
aggregates that reflect these -- including
minimum, median, mean and maximum
values.
Find some popular replacement for
measures of price, like measures of
hunger, absences of clothing, shelter,
health, and personal safety, etc., and the
rule of inapplicable a priori logic will be
challenged successfully in the court of
public opinion.
Communism is dead. Old labor is now
new labor. Old US liberals are new
democrats. This "new" reflects the
inadequacy of the "old".
Technology is leading the way in all things.
It cannot be far away, that a technological
fix for money's failure to animate the poor
will be found. It is probably a simple thing
-- like needing more money not less.
The scare of hyper-inflation that was real
has made us fearful of just the right amount
of inflation to make sense of democratic
capitalism as the way to "leave no one
behind".
All political parties are promising this. And
they know technology can do it. Culture
responds to war, politics, law, money, and
technology, in that order. But each of these
elements has an effect on the other.
We are waiting for technology to reform
money. When this happens, economics will
come back to reality.
Meanwhile, the vocabulary of criticism of
mainstream economic dogma is nice to
look at.
o sanity, humanity and science
o excessive mathematical formalisation.
o consideration of "concrete realities".
o a "pathological taste for a-priori
ideologies and mathematical
formalisation disconnected from
reality."
o disembodiment of economic discourse
o false emulation of physics that "should
instead look to the human sciences".
John Gelles
email 1944@xxxxxxxx
url http://www.1944.org
http://www.1944.org/whatsnew.htm
- Thread context:
- RE: Gore the Eliminator, (continued)
- Disenchantment with the mainstream.,
Paul Downward Tue 05 Sep 2000, 11:50 GMT
- Virtual Reality and Economics,
ÁÎ×Ó¹â Henry C.K.Liu ¹ù¤l¥ú Mon 04 Sep 2000, 16:18 GMT
- Re: LCTM,
ÁÎ×Ó¹â Henry C.K.Liu ¹ù¤l¥ú Mon 04 Sep 2000, 04:16 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: LCTM,
Bruce McFarling Wed 06 Sep 2000, 03:50 GMT
- Re: chartalist money,
Per Gunnar Berglund Sun 03 Sep 2000, 17:33 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]