PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: causation in theory
----------
>From: David Gleicher <104201.2301@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: "Alan G. Isaac" <aisaac@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: causation in theory
>Date: Tue, May 30, 2000, 6:22 pm
>
<Snip> As Harry Veeder writes, there are fundamental
>laws of science that have no scientific basis. If one does not have faith
>in them, one simply is out of the game. So be it.
I am saying scientific laws do rely on true explanation but on
true observations. Faith is not required for the acceptance of a
scientific law.
Harry Veeder
- Thread context:
- Re: causation in theory, (continued)
- Re: causation in theory,
Harry Veeder Tue 30 May 2000, 16:29 GMT
- Re: causation in theory,
David Gleicher Tue 30 May 2000, 17:23 GMT
- Re: causation in theory,
Harry Veeder Tue 30 May 2000, 18:19 GMT
- Re: causation in theory,
Harry Veeder Tue 30 May 2000, 18:19 GMT
- Re: causation in theory,
Alan G. Isaac Tue 30 May 2000, 18:56 GMT
- FW: causation in theory,
Harry Veeder Tue 30 May 2000, 21:26 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]