PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: text query
- To: POST-KEYNESIAN THOUGHT <pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: text query
- From: "Jeff Konz" <jkonz@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 08:58:50 -50
- Comments: Authenticated sender is <jkonz@bulldog.unca.edu>
- Message-tag: 2224
Mat--
I've used Snowden, et. al., in a senior seminar with some success. I
would hesitate, though, unlike Louis-Phillipe, to use it at the
intermediate level. I think that students need a good foundation in
Keynes and modern macroeconomic thought before they tackle this work,
since it is so full of information.
Louis-Phillipe--How are you using Galbraith and Darity? I thought
that book was out of print, and had been for some
time--unfortunately for us!!
Jeff Konz
Department of Economics
UNC--Asheville
> Hi,
>
> The book is really excellent I find. It clearly spells out the different
> approaches well. I use it in undergraduate macro, intermediate level.
> At that level, it requires a carefull lecture because it can be
> difficult for the students. I use it in conjonction with Galbriath and
> Darity. The students read Galbraith first, and then Snowdon. This
> sequence makes it easier.
>
> The vbook has a very weak post-Keynesian part, and it is lumped in with
> the neo-Austrians. But aprt from that, I enjoy it and the students
> enjoy the book as well.
>
> LPR
>
> Mathew Forstater wrote:
>
> > A colleague is considering using _A Modern Guide to Macroeconomics_
> > by Snowden, Vane and Wynarczyk (Elgar, 1994) for a course. Has
> > anybody here used it, especially for undegrad intermediate or advanced
> > macro or M.A. macro? If so, what were the strengths and weaknesses,
> > how did you use it (e.g., main text or supplementary), etc.? Would
> > you use it again? Thanks in advance. Mat
>
>
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]