PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Galbraith's Fearless Challenge: Read It.
What is the difference between American economics
(as in the American Economic Association) and Ameri-
can business (as in industries, firms and lobbyists who
persuade Congress to define our economy to favor
themselves and those who buy its majority votes)?
There are distinctions -- but maybe no difference, (as
the old saying goes.) But Jamie Galbraith has written
a sparkling critique of economics, neoliberal, if not
just plain American, which, if I remember, he calls
"mainstream". You have to read it for sheer pleasure.
Goto http://www.prospect.org/archives/V11-7/galbraith-j.html
After you've read it the question he asks will haunt
you: If we would succeed in solving our current
economic problem -- to end poverty, pollution,
unemployment, self-absorbtion and just plain
ignorance (among both the educated and the
unlearned) -- must we move beyond the law of
property and phenomenon of price to develop
systems that trail behind a steadily rising
minimum standard of living?
These will be both business and economic
systems, the former focused on firms,
industries, and markets, the latter on nations,
peoples, and the human species on earth.
We must design and implement not just ways
to maximize personal gain, but a full blown
economic system with enough adaptability to
conquer uncertainty, -- until nature itself, in the
form of a devasting event, (not mere human
greed), ends all we have made of the bounty
it provided its favored species til then.
I think the full blown system will assign to an
inflation protected account the task of limited
self-correction for inflation that eats away at
the value of lawful money.
That would put an end to taxation, interest
and unemployment presently assigned to the
difficult task above. (Of course, compromise
may be wise -- to let interest linger awhile,
at rates low enough not to steal food out
of the mouths of the poor.)
Certainly the full blown system will not be a
reflection of the unconscionable opportunism
prevailing today -- for, if it is, poverty and
pollution will do us in.
Yet the force for self-absorbtion that Jamie
Galbraith observes, (and may be driving these
querty keys), will not be easily displaced by
information engineering determined to
rationalize business and the national interest.
Data warehousing, mining, and decision support
have made a 34 year old quant jockey, from
MIT and Dupont, the owner of 6,000 million
dollars. He sees the value of information to
reduce cost -- and thereby earn a great deal of
money whose capital value has climbed sky-high
after a public offering that tied investment and
speculation into an unfathomable knot.
This is an example of new wealth, built on
science and debt, that seems unlikely to create
sustainable real wealth in homes, health, food,
and the stuff of modern life -- unless the unsolved
elements of a market economy, (like the general
provision of a decent parachute for all at risk
of failure to offer a saleable product), are, in
fact, solved.
How? By expansion of the law of private
property to include an economic bill of rights,
as well as, solid strategic plans to produce real
wealth in abundance.
John Gelles
email 1944@xxxxxxxx
url http://1944.org
- Thread context:
- Re: moore on lending, (continued)
- Eichner,
Paul Downward Fri 25 Feb 2000, 11:49 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Eichner,
David Dequech Fri 25 Feb 2000, 18:07 GMT
- Re: Eichner,
David Dequech Sat 26 Feb 2000, 16:21 GMT
- Galbraith's Fearless Challenge: Read It.,
John Gelles Fri 25 Feb 2000, 07:26 GMT
- Japan,
GGard97342 Thu 24 Feb 2000, 22:34 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Japan,
J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Fri 25 Feb 2000, 19:20 GMT
- Re: Japan,
Greg Nowell Fri 25 Feb 2000, 22:27 GMT
- Re: Japan,
ÁÎ×Ó¹â HenryC.K.Liu ¹ù¤l¥ú Sat 26 Feb 2000, 05:21 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]