PKT
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: Galbraith and The American Prospect



Paul:
 
Re. James Galbraith's comments:

"The notion of supply and demand as the organizing principle for everything is a few decades more than a century old. (It was not so for Smith, Ricardo, Malthus, Marx, or Mill.) The key player in the Anglo-Saxon tradition is Alfred Marshall; in the continental tradition, no doubt, Leon Walras. In the twentieth century, great economists including Keynes, Joseph Schumpeter, and John Kenneth Galbraith have tried to break the grip of this notion on the professional imagination. But they have not succeeded."

As (a) long-time student of classical economic thought, and (b) new subscriber to the PKT list, I submit that "the notion of supply and demand as the organizing principle" is central not only to mainstream and monetarist economics but also to PKT economics as exemplified by recent exchanges on the PKT list.

In this respect, I take as my point of departure Schumpeter's remark to the effect that, by completing the Classical Research Agenda in the field of Value Theory in mid-nineteenth century, John Stuart Mill brought economic theory to a "half-way house".

As I see it, all subsequent attempts by theorists to advance beyond this "half-way house" are ultimately predicated on the notion that economic theory is properly regarded as a branch of mathematics rather than logic. 

In his memorial article on Schumpeter, Samuelson expressed surprise that the newly-departed (a) had so stated and, after some dallying therewith, (b) had turned thumbs down on econometrics as the wave of the future.

This is how John Maynard Keynes summarized the Say-Mill-Keynes-Schumpeter view of economics as branch of logic in 1922:

"The Theory of Economics does not furnish a body of settled conclusions immediately applicable to a policy.  It is a method rather than a doctrine, an apparatus of the mind, a technique of thinking, which helps its possessor to draw correct conclusions."

Gunnar

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 2:22 PM
Subject: Galbraith and The American Prospect

For those of you who did not receive the following message on your email I repeat it:
There's a great article by James K. Galbraith, entitled "How the Economists
>>Got it Wrong," that appeared in the American Prospect a couple weeks ago.
>>Well worth checking out.  It can be found at
>>http://www.prospect.org/archives/V11-7/galbraith-j.html
>>
>
I encourage all to read this article. Jamie's characterization of Paul Krugman is especially appropriate.

Great article Jamie!!

Paul

Paul Davidson
Holly Chair of Excellence in Political Economy
Editor, JOURNAL OF POST KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS
Economics Department, 523 SMC
University of Tennessee
Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-0550
phone: (865)974-4221
fax: (865) 974-4601
email: pdavidson@xxxxxxx
web page: http://econ.bus.utk.edu/Davidson.html


Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]