Can anyone explain the three different values for personal savings (PS). For example, in 1995 Economic Report of the President has PS at 249.3 billion (Table B-30); Flow of Funds from the Federal Reserve has PS at 264.6 billon (Table F.9); NIPA has PS at 302.4 billion.
Part of the problem is that in October 1999, the US Department of Commerce changed the components that make up Personal Savings in NIPA. The main (but not only change) was adding "Government employee's contributions to pension plans" to the personal savings catagory. That one change moved the personal savings rate from approximately 0 per cent to approximately 3 per cent. It had nothing to do with statistical discrepancies. "A Rose by any other name...."
This range of values seems outside the range of "statistical" discrepancies. Thanks, DR _
Paul
_________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com
- Re: Inverted yield curves - not a big deal?, (continued)
- Re: Inverted yield curves - not a big deal?, ÁÎ×Ó¹â HenryC.K.Liu ¹ù¤l¥ú Sat 05 Feb 2000, 22:59 GMT
- Re: Inverted yield curves - not a big deal?, Warren Mosler Sat 05 Feb 2000, 23:33 GMT
- Euro < Dollar - European political crisis pending?, Sven R Larson Tue 01 Feb 2000, 15:44 GMT
- Various measeures of Personal Savings in National Accounts, Daniel J Rogers Mon 31 Jan 2000, 23:27 GMT
- Re: Various measeures of Personal Savings in National Accounts, paul davidson Tue 01 Feb 2000, 19:53 GMT
- Re: Exhaustible, Renewable Resources versus Inexhaustible, Nonrenewable Resources, Paul Davidson Mon 31 Jan 2000, 22:25 GMT
- Re: Exhaustible, Renewable Resources versus Inexhaustible,Nonrenewable Resources, ÁÎ×Ó¹â HenryC.K.Liu ¹ù¤l¥ú Tue 01 Feb 2000, 19:08 GMT
- Re: New Keynesian Growth Models, Per Gunnar Berglund Mon 31 Jan 2000, 16:39 GMT
- Wealth, Liquidity and Uncertainty, John Gelles Mon 31 Jan 2000, 15:38 GMT