RE: Summer discussion on GT

[Brian Considine <bconsidi@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

		We should make a strict policy of using uniform subject
headings in our posts to refer to which chapter group we are talking about.
This way we can have several threads going at once and all the readers have
to do is sort the posts by subject.

				-----Original Message-----
				From:	Kit Taylor
[mailto:kitaylor@xxxxxxxxxxx]
				Sent:	Thursday, June 03, 1999 10:56 AM
				To:	POST-KEYNESIAN THOUGHT
				Subject:	RE: Summer discussion on GT

				That plan sounds good to me -- if there is a
way to keep the timing flexible
				- can we overlap the chapter discussions?
Perhaps break the GT down into
				groups of chapters and keep an open-ended
discussion going on each group?  I
				suspect that many of us will be in and out
during the summer -- it would be
				helpful if the discussion could be
structured in such a way that someone who
				is gone for two or three weeks would be able
to follow what was missed upon
				their return.

				Kit Sims Taylor
				kitaylor@xxxxxxxxxxx
	
http://online.bcc.ctc.edu/econ/kst/Kstpage.htm

				> ----------
				> From: 	LP
				> Reply To: 	pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
				> Sent: 	Thursday, June 03, 1999 7:02
AM
				> To: 	POST-KEYNESIAN THOUGHT
				> Subject: 	Summer discussion on GT
				>
				>
				> hi,
				>
				> I am intrigued by this summer's discussion
of the GT.  I am wondering
				> how feasible it would be to have a draft
written up after
				> each discussion.  Since we are discussing
ideas about books, textbooks,
				> etc, it would be very useful, for
seminars, etc, to have a
				> reader to the General Theory.  I myself
started one a few years back but
				> never finished it.
				>
				> If people could volunteer their services
to write a summary of the
				> discussion after each chapter, I think
this would be a very
				> useful endeavor.  Wecould assign chapters
to verious willing
				> participants.  I would be happy to write
something on chaper 13, for
				> example.
				>
				> We could compile these drafts at the end.
				>
				> There are difficulties, of course. We may
not all agree, but there may
				> be a way of including these differences,
making the drafts
				> more interesting.
				>
				> Please let me know about this idea. I am
eager to hear from you.
				>
				> Louis-Philippe
				>