PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Is Keynes a Positivist
"If science is to be at all possible, it must take
the form of elaborating regularities of the type
'whenever event x then event y'"
-- Stephen Parsons, quoting Lawson, in
his book Economics and Reality, today
Positivism, even logical positivist philosophy,
does not exclude history or sequences of events
not replicable for scientific experiment.
Naturally, connections sought between events
that cannot be isolated for modeling in a
scientific way, must be identified as possibilities
-- not computable probabilities.
We must not be sore just because most of life
remains a mystery. Living with mystery and
its possibilities, whilst converting to probability
some data that is amenable to rigorous examination,
is what we humans do. And many us say we are
positivists while we do it.
John Gelles
http://www.1944.org
http://www.rain.org/~jjgelles/1944.html
- Thread context:
- [Fwd: [Fwd: RV: para perder tiempo]],
Pablo Nazur Wed 02 Jun 1999, 13:14 GMT
- Keynes archive,
sduno Wed 02 Jun 1999, 12:32 GMT
- Is Keynes a Positivist,
stephen Wed 02 Jun 1999, 08:31 GMT
- Re: Money, Taxes, and Government Debt,
William B. Ryan Wed 02 Jun 1999, 00:38 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]