|
For some reason, which completely eludes me,
Post keynesians have appeared sympathetic to Bhaskar's transcendental/critical
realism.
In his General Theory, Keynes
writes:
"The outline of our theory can be expressed
as follows. When employment increases, aggregate real income is increased".
(p. 27)
According to Lawson, in his book Economics and
Reality, positivism can be characterised in terms of the belief
that:
"If science is to be at all possible, it
must take the form of elaborating regularities of the type 'whenever event x
then event y'" (p. 19)
Hence Keynes is a positivist - or am I missing
something?
Stephen Parsons
|
- Re: economics of Yugoslav war, (continued)
- Re: economics of Yugoslav war, J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. Thu 03 Jun 1999, 15:41 GMT
- war and economics, tim canova Wed 02 Jun 1999, 17:09 GMT
- [Fwd: [Fwd: RV: para perder tiempo]], Pablo Nazur Wed 02 Jun 1999, 13:14 GMT
- Keynes archive, sduno Wed 02 Jun 1999, 12:32 GMT
- Is Keynes a Positivist, stephen Wed 02 Jun 1999, 08:31 GMT
- Re: Is Keynes a Positivist, chip poirot Wed 02 Jun 1999, 11:46 GMT
- Re: Is Keynes a Positivist, John Gelles Wed 02 Jun 1999, 19:41 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Is Keynes a Positivist, Uche Kaja Wed 02 Jun 1999, 19:44 GMT
- RE: Is Keynes a Positivist, Uche Kaja Wed 02 Jun 1999, 19:51 GMT