PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: S=I, an old debate.
At 05:54 PM 8/17/98 +1000, you wrote:
>At 00:26 17/08/98 -0700, you wrote:
>
>>I could, say, use part of my cash holdings to purchase a new financial
>>asset.
>
> Then net savings have not changed, they have just changed hands.
>(BTW, readers will note that this is one of the first issues covered in that
>dusty old GT).
>
>
>
>Virtually,
>
>Bruce McFarling, Newcastle, NSW
>ecbm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No, you forgot the distinction between savings and saving. Saving
is with respect to a given time period. Savings is an accumulation,
a stock. I'm changing the composition of my stock, so to speak. I'm
now holding a financial asset and less money, say, pari passu, but the
purchase of the asset increased my rate of saving, ceteris paribus,
while the reduction in my cash holdings (stock) did not affect
the current flow of saving.
Chas
- Thread context:
- Re: S=I, an old debate., (continued)
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Mon 17 Aug 1998, 06:37 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Bruce R. McFarling Mon 17 Aug 1998, 07:17 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Mon 17 Aug 1998, 07:26 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Bruce R. McFarling Mon 17 Aug 1998, 07:54 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Mon 17 Aug 1998, 08:12 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Bruce R. McFarling Tue 18 Aug 1998, 05:00 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Tue 18 Aug 1998, 07:44 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Bruce R. McFarling Tue 18 Aug 1998, 10:15 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Tue 18 Aug 1998, 18:23 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]