PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: S=I, an old debate.
At 05:17 PM 8/17/98 +1000, you wrote:
>At 23:21 16/08/98 -0700, Chas wrote:
>>At 04:03 PM 8/17/98 +1000, you wrote:
>>> For the purchase of assets that were not financed out of income,
>>>how was the purchase financed?
>
>>Say, dishoarding if income is defined as receipt of money income, more
>>possibilities if income is defined as value of current output.
>
> OK, on receipt of money income, then. How do they engage in
>dishoarding without S-S=0 ?
>
>Virtually,
>
>Bruce McFarling, Newcastle, NSW
>ecbm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I could, say, use part of my cash holdings to purchase a new financial
asset.
Chas
- Thread context:
- Re: S=I, an old debate., (continued)
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Bruce R. McFarling Mon 17 Aug 1998, 06:03 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Mon 17 Aug 1998, 06:21 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Mon 17 Aug 1998, 06:37 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Bruce R. McFarling Mon 17 Aug 1998, 07:17 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Mon 17 Aug 1998, 07:26 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Bruce R. McFarling Mon 17 Aug 1998, 07:54 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Mon 17 Aug 1998, 08:12 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Bruce R. McFarling Tue 18 Aug 1998, 05:00 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Tue 18 Aug 1998, 07:44 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]