PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: S=I, an old debate.
At 23:21 16/08/98 -0700, Chas wrote:
>At 04:03 PM 8/17/98 +1000, you wrote:
>> For the purchase of assets that were not financed out of income,
>>how was the purchase financed?
>Say, dishoarding if income is defined as receipt of money income, more
>possibilities if income is defined as value of current output.
OK, on receipt of money income, then. How do they engage in
dishoarding without S-S=0 ?
Virtually,
Bruce McFarling, Newcastle, NSW
ecbm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread context:
- Re: S=I, an old debate., (continued)
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Mon 17 Aug 1998, 04:09 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Bruce R. McFarling Mon 17 Aug 1998, 06:03 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Mon 17 Aug 1998, 06:21 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Mon 17 Aug 1998, 06:37 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Bruce R. McFarling Mon 17 Aug 1998, 07:17 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Mon 17 Aug 1998, 07:26 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Bruce R. McFarling Mon 17 Aug 1998, 07:54 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Mon 17 Aug 1998, 08:12 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Bruce R. McFarling Tue 18 Aug 1998, 05:00 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]