PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: S=I, an old debate.
At 04:03 PM 8/17/98 +1000, you wrote:
>At 21:09 16/08/98 -0700, Chas wrote:
>
>>Paul, I would define saving as the purchase of new interest-bearing
financial
>>assets, and non interest-bearing assets. This definition would extend to
>>account for the purchase of new capital from income where I=S. Saving,
>>however, need not flow from current income regardless of how one defines
>>the latter concept, i.e., value of current output or receipt of money
income.
>
> For the purchase of assets that were not financed out of income,
>how was the purchase financed?
>
>
>Virtually,
>
>Bruce McFarling, Newcastle, NSW
>ecbm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Say, dishoarding if income is defined as receipt of money income, more
possibilities if income is defined as value of current output.
Chas
- Thread context:
- Re: S=I, an old debate., (continued)
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Paul Davidson Mon 17 Aug 1998, 00:40 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Bruce R. McFarling Mon 17 Aug 1998, 01:52 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Mon 17 Aug 1998, 04:09 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Bruce R. McFarling Mon 17 Aug 1998, 06:03 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Mon 17 Aug 1998, 06:21 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Mon 17 Aug 1998, 06:37 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Bruce R. McFarling Mon 17 Aug 1998, 07:17 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Mon 17 Aug 1998, 07:26 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Bruce R. McFarling Mon 17 Aug 1998, 07:54 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]