PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: S=I, an old debate.
At 21:09 16/08/98 -0700, Chas wrote:
>Paul, I would define saving as the purchase of new interest-bearing financial
>assets, and non interest-bearing assets. This definition would extend to
>account for the purchase of new capital from income where I=S. Saving,
>however, need not flow from current income regardless of how one defines
>the latter concept, i.e., value of current output or receipt of money income.
For the purchase of assets that were not financed out of income,
how was the purchase financed?
Virtually,
Bruce McFarling, Newcastle, NSW
ecbm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread context:
- Re: S=I, an old debate., (continued)
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Bob Williams Sun 16 Aug 1998, 23:25 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Paul Davidson Mon 17 Aug 1998, 00:40 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Bruce R. McFarling Mon 17 Aug 1998, 01:52 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Mon 17 Aug 1998, 04:09 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Bruce R. McFarling Mon 17 Aug 1998, 06:03 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Mon 17 Aug 1998, 06:21 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Mon 17 Aug 1998, 06:37 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Bruce R. McFarling Mon 17 Aug 1998, 07:17 GMT
- Re: S=I, an old debate.,
Chas Anderson Mon 17 Aug 1998, 07:26 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]