PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]
Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: S=I, an old debate.

Bruce R. McFarling wrote:

<<SNIP>>
>         Any stock that is not fixed at a single level has an
> associated flow.  So pointing out that there is a flow of
> something does not prove by itself that there is no stock
> of that thing.
<<SNIP>>

Actually, pointing to a flow of a thing pretty much proves there is a
stock of the thing -- else what is it that flows?

			-- jbod

		Tax Privilege, Not People
___________________________________________________
Come visit and see a new economic perspective --
       http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/1067
           Comments/arguments welcome.
..
[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]