PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Sweden -- A few reactions on the N.Y. Times article,lbo-talk@panix.com
- To: pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Sweden -- A few reactions on the N.Y. Times article,lbo-talk@panix.com
- From: "William S. Lear" <rael@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 15:45:21 -0500 (CDT)
On Tue, August 11, 1998 at 15:06:40 (-0400) Rosser Jr, John Barkley writes:
>...
> Well, I have already argued that a chaos/complexity
>view of financial markets implies that they are inherently
>and endogenously unstable. Now, it may be that "we" who
>have read Marx, Keynes, Galbraith, Minksy, Kindleberger,
>Shiller, and other assorted types (and even Henwood's _Wall
>Street_), may "know" this. But there are a lot of
>economists and financial types who don't, who claim that
>the market is efficient, that it is endogenously stable,
>and that the only reason we see volatility is due to
>exogenous "noise" ...
I might add that this argument can also be applied to the whole school
of rational expectations, which chaos theory makes an absolute mess
of...
Bill
- Thread context:
- RE: Sweden -- A few reactions on the N.Y. Times article,lbo-talk@ panix.com,
Colander, David Tue 11 Aug 1998, 20:55 GMT
- Stockholm. Knoxville. We have a problem.,
John Gelles Tue 11 Aug 1998, 20:41 GMT
- Re: Sweden -- A few reactions on the N.Y. Times article,lbo-talk@panix.com,
Rosser Jr, John Barkley Tue 11 Aug 1998, 19:06 GMT
- Re: Sweden -- A few reactions on the N.Y. Times article,
Dennis R Redmond Tue 11 Aug 1998, 10:46 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]