PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Does debt matter
On Thu, 30 Oct 1997, Basil Moore wrote:
> The Post Keynesian position is that modern capitalist econopmies are
> demand-constrained rather than supply-constrained. Inflation is cost driven,
> and output is demand driven. The AS curve is horizontal, and the AD curve is
> vertical.
I think this was basically correct for 30 years following WWII but since the
end of the '70's a changing culture of employment has made supply constraints
relevant again.
>
> So restrictive monetary policy (high real interest rates) has the
> primary effect of reducing AD and so output and employment. It has only a
> secondary, weak and indirect effect of reducing the inflation rate by
> reducing the rate of growth of unit labour costs, through the Phillips Curve
> argument that higher employment reduces labour's bargaining power (Marx's
> reserve army of unemployed).
>
> Basil Moore
>
Harry Veeder
- Thread context:
- Re: Does debt matter, (continued)
- Re: Does debt matter,
Hyman Blumenstock Thu 30 Oct 1997, 03:40 GMT
- Re: Does Debt Matter,
Per Gunnar Berglund Thu 30 Oct 1997, 12:42 GMT
- Re: Does Debt Matter,
James R. Olson, jr. Thu 30 Oct 1997, 13:29 GMT
- Re: Does debt matter,
Basil Moore Thu 30 Oct 1997, 15:58 GMT
- Re: Does debt matter,
Harry Veeder Thu 30 Oct 1997, 17:23 GMT
- Re: Does Debt Matter,
William F. Hummel Thu 30 Oct 1997, 18:15 GMT
- Re: Does Debt Matter,
Charles Anderson Thu 30 Oct 1997, 19:22 GMT
- Re: Does debt matter,
John Gelles Thu 30 Oct 1997, 20:15 GMT
- Re: Does debt matter,
John B. O'Donnell Fri 31 Oct 1997, 00:56 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]