PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Q on Keynes and economic time
S R Larsson wrote:
>
> I need to refer to Keynes's definition of economic time - a day, he says,
> is "the minimum effective unit of economic time", but I can't remember
> where to find that definition. Is it in the GT? Elsewhere?
Sven:
To the best of my knowledge, the day as the "atom" of time originated
with Robertsonian dynamics. It is a natural derivative of the
equation of exchange, e.g., MV=PY is divided on both sides by V to
yield M=PT, the exchange of money for final goods in a single circuit
period, and then M=PT is divided on both sides by k, the circuit period
in terms of days, to yield M/k=P(T/k), the expenditure of money against
final goods proportioned to a single day.
In his BANKING POLICY AND THE PRICE LEVEL, Robertson talks about the
closeness with Keynes during the period in which he was formulating
the method for this work, but Robertson was probably the originator
of the concept being more developed in dynamic methods.
Chas
- Thread context:
- Re: class & inflation, (continued)
- Greg N. on Davidson,
Paul Davidson Wed 29 Oct 1997, 18:20 GMT
- Re: Q on Keynes and economic time,
paul davidson Wed 29 Oct 1997, 17:09 GMT
- Controls, Measures and Relevance,
John B. O'Donnell Wed 29 Oct 1997, 17:01 GMT
- Hobson, Keynes, "Infinite Wants," & the break with classicism,
Gregoire de Nowell (ci-devant) Wed 29 Oct 1997, 16:53 GMT
- Assessing the contribution of dead thinkers.,
Harry Veeder Wed 29 Oct 1997, 15:59 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]