Re: moore on term structure

To: pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: moore on term structure
From: Randy Wray <lwray@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 12:13:42 -0600 (MDT)

basil
i see you had a caveat that you are speaking of only the govt bil/bond
rate. that is not what i was speaking of.
here it may be useful to think of the notion of duration. kregel has
some papers on this.
randy wray

Prev by Date: Re: Krugman's growth limit
Next by Date: Re: Can the Fed set the long-rate?
Previous by thread: Re: moore on term structure
Next by thread: Re: moore on term structure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: moore on term structure, (continued)
  - Re: moore on term structure, Warren Mosler Fri 10 Oct 1997, 13:14 GMT
  - Re: moore on term structure, Doug Henwood Fri 10 Oct 1997, 13:28 GMT
  - Re: moore on term structure, William F. Hummel Fri 10 Oct 1997, 16:19 GMT
  - Re: moore on term structure, Randy Wray Fri 10 Oct 1997, 16:21 GMT
  - Re: moore on term structure, Randy Wray Fri 10 Oct 1997, 18:13 GMT
  - Re: moore on term structure, Basil Moore Fri 10 Oct 1997, 20:24 GMT
  - Re: moore on term structure, Basil Moore Fri 10 Oct 1997, 20:40 GMT
  - Re: moore on term structure, Warren Mosler Fri 10 Oct 1997, 20:49 GMT
  - Re: moore on term structure, Warren Mosler Fri 10 Oct 1997, 21:24 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]