PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Danby Seminar -- liquidity and Thirlwall
I'm very grateful to Bruce for working through these issues
with me and I'll spend more time working on this over the
weekend. In the meantime though there's one passage I'm not
clear on:
> The Thirlwall's law argument is *within* Davidson's
> world, in which the *lower* limit on a buffer stock and
> the *upper* limit on a buffer stock are very much assymetric
> boundaries.
What's the buffer stock we're talking about? What's the
significance of the boundary asymmetry?
Thanks, Colin
PS I'll be away from the 'net for the next 48 hours or so.
- Thread context:
- Re: Hummel Inquiry, (continued)
- Symposium on ELR,
MARIO SECCARECCIA Fri 10 Oct 1997, 18:31 GMT
- PK: A "Logical System" or "Set of Goals",
John Gelles Fri 10 Oct 1997, 17:53 GMT
- Re: Danby Seminar -- liquidity and Thirlwall,
Colin Danby Fri 10 Oct 1997, 17:48 GMT
- Danby seminar: Mexico, Malaysia, and the Perils of Liberalization,
Colin Danby Fri 10 Oct 1997, 16:42 GMT
- Re: Can the Fed set the long-rate?,
William F. Hummel Fri 10 Oct 1997, 16:24 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]