PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: bubbles and panics, or rational responses?
Basil Moore,
Question on rational bubbles, rational expectations and growth.
If what you have in mind is a representative agent model, what is your theory
behind the supposition that an asset could have a positive growth rate in
the long run?
That is, does discounted present value over an *infinite* horizon really
mean anything to asset markets.
Mike Metz
On Thu, 9 Oct 1997, Basil Moore wrote:
> James Olsen
>
> The claim is that asset values are the discounted present value of
> the future income stream to which the owner is entitled. If the income
> stream is a perpetuity, and if it is expected to grow at a rate in excess of
> the rate at which the asset is discounted, the discounted present value of
> the asset becomes infinite.
>
> It does not of course follow that the price will be infinite.
But it
> is the cause of a "rational bubble.
>
>
> Basil Moore
- Thread context:
- Re: Henwood/Wray/Nowell on Cranks, (continued)
- bubbles and panics, or rational responses?,
James R. Olson, jr. Thu 09 Oct 1997, 03:17 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: bubbles and panics, or rational responses?,
James R. Olson, jr. Thu 09 Oct 1997, 05:25 GMT
- Re: bubbles and panics, or rational responses?,
Basil Moore Thu 09 Oct 1997, 22:29 GMT
- Re: bubbles and panics, or rational responses?,
Mike Metz Thu 09 Oct 1997, 23:39 GMT
- Re: bubbles and panics, or rational responses?,
Basil Moore Fri 10 Oct 1997, 19:51 GMT
- Crank This,
John Gelles Thu 09 Oct 1997, 01:03 GMT
- RE: Am I The Only One?,
James R. Olson, jr. Thu 09 Oct 1997, 00:49 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Am I The Only One?,
Paul Henry Rosenberg Thu 09 Oct 1997, 15:23 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]