PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
bubbles and panics, or rational responses?
At 06:14 PM 10/9/97 +0000, Oliver Kamm wrote:
> Consider what happened to the UK stock market when sterling left the
European >Exchange Rate Mechanism - not a bubble, but a rational response
to new >information.
Interpreting one price collapse as the result of a rational response to new
information doesn't mean that every collapse fits the mold, or that there
is no such thing as a price bubble.
Are you claiming that the Tokyo land bubble was a rational response to the
intrinsic value of Tokyo real estate?
- Thread context:
- Re: Today's Wall Street Journal on Mankiw's new textbook, (continued)
- Re: Henwood/Wray/Nowell on Cranks,
Hyman Blumenstock Thu 09 Oct 1997, 04:06 GMT
- bubbles and panics, or rational responses?,
James R. Olson, jr. Thu 09 Oct 1997, 03:17 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: bubbles and panics, or rational responses?,
James R. Olson, jr. Thu 09 Oct 1997, 05:25 GMT
- Re: bubbles and panics, or rational responses?,
Basil Moore Thu 09 Oct 1997, 22:29 GMT
- Re: bubbles and panics, or rational responses?,
Mike Metz Thu 09 Oct 1997, 23:39 GMT
- Re: bubbles and panics, or rational responses?,
Basil Moore Fri 10 Oct 1997, 19:51 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]