PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: moore on term structure (Henwood's post)
Doug: Even if bonds are churned, anyone holding one will experience a
larger capital loss if rates rise during that thirty days and they have to
sell (a larger loss than if they were holding short securities - look at a
bond table). The greater risk demands a higher expected return.
Chris
On Tue, 7 Oct 1997, Doug Henwood wrote:
> Christopher Niggle wrote:
>
> >Perhaps I'm missing something but the straighforward answer for the long
> >maturity premium is that long bonds have greater interest rate risk, and
> >most bond investors are risk averse....right?
>
> Except that the average holding period for a US Treasury long bond is about
> 30 days.
>
> Doug
>
>
>
>
- Thread context:
- Re: Am I The Only One?, (continued)
- Re: Danby seminar: Nowell comments,
James R. Olson, jr. Wed 08 Oct 1997, 20:21 GMT
- Re: moore on term structure (Henwood's post),
Christopher Niggle Wed 08 Oct 1997, 19:24 GMT
- Capitalism and the MS Empire,
John Gelles Wed 08 Oct 1997, 18:43 GMT
- Re: Danby seminar: liquidity,
Colin Danby Wed 08 Oct 1997, 18:09 GMT
- T-bond holding period,
Doug Henwood Wed 08 Oct 1997, 14:42 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]