PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: T-bond holding period
William F. Hummel wrote:
>The point I am suggesting is that the average may not be a good
>reflection of what is going on. Some institutions like insurance
>companies, foundations, endowments, foreign central banks, etc.
>are long term holders of bonds, not traders. The traders may be
>rapidly turning over a small fraction of any particular issue
>giving the appearance of a short holding period on average. I
>think one has to look behind the figure quoted by the Benzie in
>the BIS before deciding what it really means.
But the ones who trade actively have a disproportionate influence in
setting the price, no?
Doug
- Thread context:
- Capitalism and the MS Empire,
John Gelles Wed 08 Oct 1997, 18:43 GMT
- Re: Danby seminar: liquidity,
Colin Danby Wed 08 Oct 1997, 18:09 GMT
- T-bond holding period,
Doug Henwood Wed 08 Oct 1997, 14:42 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: T-bond holding period,
William F. Hummel Wed 08 Oct 1997, 16:10 GMT
- Re: T-bond holding period,
Doug Henwood Wed 08 Oct 1997, 17:58 GMT
- Re: T-bond holding period,
William F. Hummel Wed 08 Oct 1997, 18:04 GMT
- Re: T-bond holding period,
Doug Henwood Wed 08 Oct 1997, 19:54 GMT
- Re: T-bond holding period,
William F. Hummel Wed 08 Oct 1997, 21:33 GMT
- Re: some cranks? <343A9131.52B3@pacbell.net> <3.0.1.16.19971007060331.348f2766@pop.lava.net>,
John B. O'Donnell Wed 08 Oct 1997, 05:12 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]