PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Reengineering the Fed
It may be difficult to prove empirically that
Redmond is exactly right -- but he is. When
a general view is taken -- and real growth is,
say, 4 percent, then if one wanted some of that
growth to be enjoyed by labor (to encourage
them to continue contributing to such growth),
real reward to capital would have to be held
to a fair lesser amount -- say, half of it.
Remember, wage labor would still be getting
a paltry raise compared to management and
owners.
In WWII, when growth was maximized, real
interest was negative, real growth was over
7%.
----- msg separator -----
On Mon, 6 Oct 1997, Dennis R Redmond wrote:
"What should the Fed do? Keep real interest rates
consistently lower than real GDP growth."
- Thread context:
- Re: Forced saving in lieu of income tax, (continued)
- Re: Reengineering the Fed,
Dennis R Redmond Mon 06 Oct 1997, 21:33 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Reengineering the Fed,
William F. Hummel Mon 06 Oct 1997, 23:00 GMT
- Re: Reengineering the Fed,
Basil Moore Mon 06 Oct 1997, 23:37 GMT
- Re: Reengineering the Fed,
John Gelles Tue 07 Oct 1997, 03:06 GMT
- Re: Reengineering the Fed,
James R. Olson, jr. Tue 07 Oct 1997, 10:21 GMT
- Re: Reengineering the Fed,
Per Gunnar Berglund Tue 07 Oct 1997, 12:18 GMT
- Re: Reengineering the Fed,
Basil Moore Tue 07 Oct 1997, 18:58 GMT
- Re: Reengineering the Fed,
Dennis R Redmond Tue 07 Oct 1997, 23:31 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]