PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Incomes and Exchange rates; part 2
Juan Jose Barrios "Juanjo" wrote:
---- some snipping ---
>There is no way
>Argentina can move forward within the current radical neoclassical (imported
>from some academic thinking from the US) economic regime. The other day, a
>Uruguayan economic weekly magazine (Busqueda) *proudly* told its readers
>that the Chilean 'miracle',( starting in 1973) managed to reduce the amount
>of people living below the poverty line from 45% to 30% since 1992 to
>1997!!!! Doesn't it sound almost unbelievable? Argentina is going trhu a
>similar (more radical) process
Could you expand on this? In the U.S. we are being told of the Chilean
miracle -- proof of the free market, free trade economics. Now the
addition
of Chile to NAFTA -- the U.S. Mexico Canadian "free trade" agreement -- is
proposed and is likely. We are being told that NAFTA is a great success
or a great failure in Mexico. Is there a truth hiding somewhere?
What is wrong with reducing poverty "from 45% to 30% "?
What is the "moving forward" that cannot be done by the present regime?
Mason C
- Thread context:
- Re: Incomes and Exchange rates; part 2, (continued)
- RE: Incomes and Exchange rates; part 2,
Leticia Arroyo Abad Wed 17 Sep 1997, 18:50 GMT
- Re: Incomes and Exchange rates; part 2,
Juan Jose Barrios Wed 17 Sep 1997, 19:18 GMT
- Re: Incomes and Exchange rates; part 2,
Colin Danby Wed 17 Sep 1997, 22:38 GMT
- Re: Incomes and Exchange rates; part 2,
Juan Jose Barrios Thu 18 Sep 1997, 01:08 GMT
- Re: Incomes and Exchange rates; part 2,
Leigh Harkness Thu 18 Sep 1997, 11:38 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]