PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Fundamental Flaw of National Accounting
> On Mon, 15 Sep 1997 14:00:20 +0200, "Per Gunnar Berglund"
> <pgb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Per:
> > This was an issue that occupied my own thinking for quite some time.
> >The outcome was that there is really no need for verification, since the
> >"output--input" link is axiomatic. This is a matter of language, not of
> >empirical verification.
Every "axiom" is open to scientific testing since they are conjectures about
the nature of the real (social) world. To the extent that you can
point to existing social realities (eg. the use of money) as
examples of what is assumed to exist within your axioms then your
axioms have past a scientific test. This area of scientific (economic)
testing is as important and necessary as the need to test the
resulting axiomatic *deductions* against reality.
Harry Veeder
- Thread context:
- Re: Fundamental Flaw of National Accounting, (continued)
- Re: Fundamental Flaw of National Accounting,
Per Gunnar Berglund Tue 16 Sep 1997, 11:00 GMT
- Re: Fundamental Flaw of National Accounting,
Bruce McFarling Wed 17 Sep 1997, 04:06 GMT
- Re: Fundamental Flaw of National Accounting,
Per Gunnar Berglund Wed 17 Sep 1997, 08:37 GMT
- Re: Fundamental Flaw of National Accounting,
Per Gunnar Berglund Wed 17 Sep 1997, 08:45 GMT
- Re: Fundamental Flaw of National Accounting,
Per Gunnar Berglund Wed 17 Sep 1997, 11:43 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]