PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Mosler Seminar
I *think* we're still on the seminar?
Reactions and questions reading Randy Wray's paper:
The stirrings of the welfare-reform revolution makes the
ELR a pressing issue. We know the jobs are not now there,
or the unemployed are not qualified - if you prefer.
Some variety of ELR seems absolutely necessary, either
direct government jobs or subsidized private jobs.
As they say, "the devils in the details" but too many
devils and nothing works.
1. If the BPSE depletes the labor pool, will not the
Fed raise interest rates to restore it - at least at
the *slightest* sign of inflation?
2. Will not the presence of BPSE accelerate immigration,
especially illegal? This cannot be controlled any
more than drugs can be controlled by the drug war.
(but I *don't* mean to raise *that* subject (please).
3. Is the BPSW a "living wage"? What is a living wage?
Is it survival sleeping under a bridge, living in
a shanty, supporting one child, supporting a family?
Is a degree of health-improving hunger assumed?
4. On a BPSE job, what incentive would there be?
Ribbons and medals, "worker-of-the week" bonus?
I'm old enough to remember the gangs of WPA workers
leaning on their shovels - a sight that sickened my
father - why I remember it. Can the government, run
by kids who don't remember, now do better?
5. With no more welfare, BPSE means work or starve.
Is this not slavery without the whips?
6. Is mothering or house-wifing a job qualified for BPSW?
If not, I'd like to know why - other than the male
view of what constitutes "work."
7. Is "saving" understood to be *only* government paper
of some color? If not, why does the existence of
unemployment imply desired saving less than actual?
(I fear this is in GT and I'm going to be scolded.)
8. I confess that I have yet to accept taxes as the sole
basis of fiat money. If the government declares a money
legally enforceable "legal tender" for contracts, then
aren't taxes simply another contract payable in that
money?
9. "... bond sales are ... not necessary to 'finance'
deficit spending." I assume this refers to the ELR
generated deficit. What about the deficit generated
by other government purchases? -- or go to (10.)
10. Bond sales ... as an interest rate maintenance
operation .... Why "maintain" interest rates?
Why not let them fall and kill all the rentiers?
"Downsize This" if you will!
Mason
- Thread context:
- sixty minutes,
8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0 Mon 03 Mar 1997, 01:27 GMT
- [no subject],
William S. Lear Sun 02 Mar 1997, 23:49 GMT
- [no subject],
Mason A. Clark Sun 02 Mar 1997, 23:36 GMT
- Re: Mosler Seminar,
James R. Olson, jr. Sun 02 Mar 1997, 23:35 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Mosler Seminar,
Mason A. Clark Mon 03 Mar 1997, 08:12 GMT
- Re: Mosler Seminar,
David Lloyd-Jones Mon 03 Mar 1997, 12:46 GMT
- Re: Mosler Seminar,
Hyman Blumenstock Mon 03 Mar 1997, 13:38 GMT
- Mosler seminar,
John Vertegaal Mon 03 Mar 1997, 17:00 GMT
- Re: Mosler Seminar,
Warren Mosler Tue 04 Mar 1997, 02:37 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]