PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: News Flash: HAYEK WAS NOT AN AUSTRIAN!
At 10:22 PM 2/2/96, GREG RANSOM wrote:
>These you get non-scientists like Doug and Rockwell
>who identify political positions with scientific personalities -- which
>is just a category mistake.
Nonscientists? Category mistakes? What kind of horseshit is this? Are
scientists those people who are above politics and personality? Each of
these attributes exists in its separate category? I really don't understand
the infra-Austrian doctrinal disputes, nor is it one of my priorities in
life to decode them; I was reporting a remark of Lew Rockwell's. Like it or
not, Greg, H & vM are hyperpoliticized figures, and how they're received is
almost as important as what they said.
Doug
--
Doug Henwood
Left Business Observer
250 W 85 St
New York NY 10024-3217
USA
+1-212-874-4020 voice
+1-212-874-3137 fax
email: <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
web: <http://www.panix.com/~dhenwood/LBO_home.html>
- Thread context:
- News Flash: HAYEK WAS NOT AN AUSTRIAN!,
ROSSERJB Fri 02 Feb 1996, 18:58 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: News Flash: HAYEK WAS NOT AN AUSTRIAN!,
Doug Henwood Fri 02 Feb 1996, 23:53 GMT
- Re: News Flash: HAYEK WAS NOT AN AUSTRIAN!,
Kevin Quinn Sat 03 Feb 1996, 01:14 GMT
- Re: News Flash: HAYEK WAS NOT AN AUSTRIAN!,
GREG RANSOM Sat 03 Feb 1996, 06:22 GMT
- Re: News Flash: HAYEK WAS NOT AN AUSTRIAN!,
Doug Henwood Sat 03 Feb 1996, 17:22 GMT
- Re: News Flash: HAYEK WAS NOT AN AUSTRIAN!,
ROSSERJB Sat 03 Feb 1996, 21:31 GMT
- Will fund test,
mosler Fri 02 Feb 1996, 18:46 GMT
- Mafia-ism and Communism (New Yorker p.36, 5 Feb 96),
John Gelles Fri 02 Feb 1996, 16:24 GMT
- LETS (was Ithaca),
C.N.Gomersall Fri 02 Feb 1996, 14:27 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]