Re: gender mix -Reply

To: pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gender mix -Reply
From: LAURA EBERT <EBERT@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 1995 14:03:59 -0400

re: confusion as to why woman do not write on the P.K. network.  Well,
of course, I can only speak for myself,  and am afraid my excuse is
pretty boring, compared with other good reasons such as the
coarseness of the phallocentric, penile sociopsychological lingual
structure of men or my inability to overcome the rejection of my
phallic-father which translates into intense anxiety when confronted by
male figure-heads* (espcially older), and so on.  No, I'm afraid my excuse
is that I simply do not have time.... but, I still enjoy reading all the good
things you guys have to say!

*no pun intended.

cheers
laura Ebert

Prev by Date: message guideline
Next by Date: Re: The fundamentals of postage stamp value
Previous by thread: Re: gender mix
Next by thread: Re:limitations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re:limitations, (continued)
  - Re:limitations, Roger Koppl Tue 26 Sep 1995, 20:31 GMT
- gender mix, Doug Henwood Tue 26 Sep 1995, 16:16 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: gender mix, bill mitchell Tue 26 Sep 1995, 21:05 GMT
  - Re: gender mix, Anne Mayhew Wed 27 Sep 1995, 15:35 GMT
  - Re: gender mix -Reply, LAURA EBERT Wed 27 Sep 1995, 18:03 GMT
- frequency count, RICHARD P.F. HOLT Tue 26 Sep 1995, 16:00 GMT
- Re: rough draft for changes at pkt - correction, Trond Andresen Tue 26 Sep 1995, 13:37 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: rough draft for changes at pkt - correction, Bruce McFarling Tue 26 Sep 1995, 20:13 GMT
- RE: Re: zero inflation and recession, bjm Tue 26 Sep 1995, 13:13 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]