PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: open forum about pkt
TIME TO READ, URGE TO WRITE:
THE PROBLEM AND THE SOLUTION
1. The appropriate frequency for essays of the kind I send
to this forum, (when a membership of 400 is considered),
is one per week. This is mine for this week. The
dynamic duo, Holt and Galbraith, have brought past
sins to our attention, not in vain.
2. The appropriate way to respond to others' essays is
by private reply off list to the essayist. Please
nobody respond to this on list, until you have
finished it, if at all.
3. Why do we read a net list instead of better material
in conventional places? Because we want to converse.
We cannot converse with dead authors or the great men
of the day because they would have no time to read
ten thousand applicants for converstaion.
4. But, as Ric reminds us, even conversation with mortals
can lead to too much writing for others to read. So
solutions 1 and 2 are offered.
5. Is there a remaining problem? Yes. PKT has a mission
amd a reputation. Its mission is not puny. It is not
a club for chatter that needs no proceedings and no
archives.
6. It may be that when 1 and 2 are adhered to, there is
insufficient dialog to win any prizes -- and the net
is made for dialog. (It is not a jounal or a library.)
What to do?
7. What I will do is, per para 1, write one essay per week.
Per para 2, reply to other's posts directly to them only.
Per this para 7, if I am fortunate enough to get replies
to my essays, I will edit the replies myself and present
them as powerful commentary to a past essay IF they are
really so good that not to do so would be an affront to
PKT and the dialog purposes of the net.
8. In the para 7 task I shall be fair and shall give credit
to authors of messages edited down for one single
commentary posting per essay. (Writers who forbid me to
give them public credit should so advise me when and if
they reply off list to any essay. In such case, their
brilliant edited remarks will be credited to Anonymous.)
8. I think this forum, having an interest in things
economic, should make every effort to sell
advertising in the margins of its content. It
would put us in the real world. The money could
go to defray costs now paid by universities and
others who run the servers. If that is impractical,
the money could go to the United States Treasury
in thanks for past financing of the net from scratch.
Margins with the names of booksellers,
journals, banks and brokerages, and a government or two,
would compel the system to center all text, like this is,
to make it easy to read.
John Gelles
- Thread context:
- Re: open forum about pkt, (continued)
- Re: open forum about pkt,
kl811af Sun 24 Sep 1995, 19:09 GMT
- Re: open forum about pkt,
Herbert Gintis Sun 24 Sep 1995, 20:03 GMT
- Re: open forum about pkt,
William . Butos Mon 25 Sep 1995, 00:50 GMT
- Re: open forum about pkt,
C.N.Gomersall Mon 25 Sep 1995, 02:27 GMT
- Re: open forum about pkt,
John Gelles Mon 25 Sep 1995, 03:38 GMT
- Re: open forum about pkt,
bill mitchell Mon 25 Sep 1995, 04:09 GMT
- Re: open forum about pkt,
Robert Peter Burns Mon 25 Sep 1995, 04:49 GMT
- Re: open forum about pkt,
6155GUASTELL Mon 25 Sep 1995, 09:14 GMT
- Re: open forum about pkt,
Kevin Quinn Mon 25 Sep 1995, 12:09 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]