PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Alfred Marshall -Reply
Modern use of supply and demand analysis would surely have infuriated
Marshall who, I believe, was not all that keen on such an approach,
especially in its more sophisticated form. In a letter to A.L.Bowley dated
Feb. 7, 1906, Marshall wrote: " I had a growing feeling in the later years
of my work that a good mathematical theorem dealing with economic
hypotheses was very unlikely to be good economics." (quote on page
775 in the 9th edition of the Principles).
With respect to Marshall's supply and demand analysis, let us not forget
that Marshall was in fact very critical of such tools of analysis. In
Guillebaud's 9th edition of Marshall's Principles, Marshall launches an all
out attack on those who refuse to question S&D: "When pushed to its
more remote and intricate logical consequences, [S&D] slips away from
the conditions of real life. Its limitations are so constantly overlooked,
especially by those who approach it from an abstract point of view, that
there is a danger in throwing it into definite form at all" (461).
Louis-Philippe
- Thread context:
- Post Keynesian Study Group Newsletter (UK),
Gary F. Langer Mon 24 Apr 1995, 15:51 GMT
- cognitive psychology etc,
Michael DIETRICH Sun 23 Apr 1995, 18:09 GMT
- Alfred Marshall,
RICHARD P.F. HOLT Sat 22 Apr 1995, 22:21 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Alfred Marshall,
ROSSERJB Tue 25 Apr 1995, 07:50 GMT
- Re: Alfred Marshall -Reply,
Louis-Phillippe Rochon Tue 25 Apr 1995, 13:59 GMT
- Re: Alfred Marshall -Reply,
GREG RANSOM Tue 25 Apr 1995, 14:58 GMT
- Re: Alfred Marshall,
GREG RANSOM Tue 25 Apr 1995, 16:26 GMT
- Re: Alfred Marshall,
RICHARD P.F. HOLT Tue 25 Apr 1995, 16:34 GMT
- Re: Alfred Marshall -Reply,
RICHARD P.F. HOLT Wed 26 Apr 1995, 04:21 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]