PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Fiat Money and Models
QUESTIONS
1. From Bernie Tuchman: Can fiat money provide real
purchasing power to reach levels of growth, investment,
and monetized demand (or public financing) for environ-
mental protection and benign industrial development
where needed at home and abroad?
2. From Gonzalo Fonseca: Can nonlinear models improve
our simulation of results of policy alternatives, such
as, those that employ fiat money?
(Defining improvement as: Creating simulations
and projections which, over time, gain a following
among mainstream economists and their clients in
government.)
3. From Paul Davidson: Do linear models and persuasive
exposition offer a better way to gain a mainstream
following, as described above?
4. Since fiat money, (and other calls for radical
government intervention in the economy), run counter to
mainstream schemes for environmental protection and
economic development -- is it PKT's responsibility to
try to reach a narrow consensus first, and go on from
there, if possible?
ANSWERS
1. Japan's one percent discount rate approaches the
ideal of fiat money. But the money will not be offered
to authorities to repair the environment faster than
current practice. Rather, the money will go unused,
because Japan's economic giants are organized around
profitable exports whose rate of growth will not be
greatly spurred by low interest rates in Japan.
a. Of course, Bernie Tuchman specified that the
fiat money he wants must be international, not Yen.
I do not think there is any difference -- the hard Yen
is international. But he also desires the fiat money
to be applied to international priorities. Here he is
correct.
b. If Japanese banks encourage large investments
in Asia, as they have been allowing, then the near-fiat
Yen will stimulate Asian growth. But, in that event,
Japan will follow the path the US took in financing
its future export competitors. Fear of that history
will probably temper the use of the Yen to finance
new monsters in Asia.
c. In the end, as Tuchman says, any pump priming
with fiat money must be continuous; and must eventually
change the nature of the system from one of recurring
contractions, (constructive destruction), to one of
continuous expansion and actuarial refinement.
d. One can only hope that the US will follow the
Japanese lead and lower its discount rate -- to
actually employ zero-interest fiat money to pay for
national priorities in the social arena, as well as
environmental repair. We have a long way to go to
repair the costs of poverty that damage every
American's life.
e. Of course, in the US instance, demand for a
better standard of living will skyrocket if we inject
sufficient fiat money into the system to end poverty;
and that will require automation to be in place to meet
such huge demand. Programmed increases in purchasing
power cannot sensibly be invited to precede capacity to
produce the things to be purchased.
f. As with comment c, above, the nature of the
system will have to change to make unemployment
unthinkable. Rather than the "end of work", as some
pundits predict automation will bring, it must be the
end of idleness and mischief that the system aims for.
The transition from school to work will have to be made
smooth as silk. A negative-income loan account with the
IRS, plus first class business education from junior
high school on, can make this possible.
2. Non-linear modelling of fiat money injections into
private markets may be possible. The key is, of course,
the dynamic nature of the model. I believe most of the
programmed trading models in use by major investors who
believe market timing is possible, are of nonlinear,
dynamic design. Fiat money models would be closer to
these, in my opinion, than linear models.
3. Linear models and graceful exposition will have to
govern attempts to gain popular support for change.
This will not rule out simple curves, where they show
the truth. But, where simpler models serve to enlarge
the audience of informed voters, and these models are
presented honestly, it would seem prudent to use them.
4. The idea often heard in our messages that the main-
stream are ill informed, ought to be squelched. We all
know that civilization requires a taming of man's
anumal inheritance. Economic efficiency coxists with
moral sentiment; and the resulting rules for the growth
of civilization require adherence to values apart from
natural law: We oppose tyranny, protect individual
rights, respect life and liberty, and may soon have to
recognize certain economic rights.
a. These values come to be integrated into the
practice of political economy -- and, as they change
through political processes, economies change with
them.
b, At the heart of differences between PKT and
mainstream academic economists, as between various
individuals outside the mainstream and both inside and
outside PKT, are differences in values. If exposition
can reveal the values spoken for, the technical argu-
ment over whose model is best will resolve itself.
John Gelles jjgelles@xxxxxxxx
- Thread context:
- reality and interpretation,
Alan G. Isaac Tue 25 Apr 1995, 14:32 GMT
- Minimum Wage Study,
LONNIE K. STEVANS, DEPT. OF BCIS/QM Tue 25 Apr 1995, 13:05 GMT
- Making It Work,
John Gelles Tue 25 Apr 1995, 03:20 GMT
- Fiat Money and Models,
John Gelles Mon 24 Apr 1995, 21:12 GMT
- Post Keynesian Study Group Newsletter (UK),
Gary F. Langer Mon 24 Apr 1995, 15:51 GMT
- cognitive psychology etc,
Michael DIETRICH Sun 23 Apr 1995, 18:09 GMT
- Alfred Marshall,
RICHARD P.F. HOLT Sat 22 Apr 1995, 22:21 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]