PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: hedging: good or bad?
- Subject: Re: hedging: good or bad?
- From: "Alan G. Isaac" <AISAAC@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 95 16:47:44 EDT
As I observe the difficulties that even the Fed has in
offering a credible reservation demand for dollars, it
appears to me that size of the agent relative to the market
is in fact a key determinant of credible posted prices.
--Alan G. Isaac
On Tue, 18 Apr 1995 13:33:06 -0600 <pdavidso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>
>But Alan Isaac, it still requires Wicksteedian reservation demand to make
>a posted price stick--- It has nothing to do with degree of monopoly.
>Even in competitive market if there is reservation demand there can be
>fixed prices. Paul D. Reservation demand is not ad hoc; just saying
>posted prices or menu costs is.
- Thread context:
- Re: hedging: good or bad?, (continued)
- Re: hedging: good or bad?,
Doug Henwood Tue 18 Apr 1995, 19:15 GMT
- Re: hedging: good or bad?,
pdavidso Tue 18 Apr 1995, 20:29 GMT
- Re: hedging: good or bad?,
Alan G. Isaac Tue 18 Apr 1995, 20:38 GMT
- Re: hedging: good or bad?,
pdavidso Tue 18 Apr 1995, 20:39 GMT
- Re: hedging: good or bad?,
Alan G. Isaac Tue 18 Apr 1995, 20:47 GMT
- Re: hedging: good or bad?,
pdavidso Tue 18 Apr 1995, 20:54 GMT
- Re: hedging: good or bad?,
ho balkhy Wed 19 Apr 1995, 12:56 GMT
- Re: hedging: good or bad?,
Doug Henwood Wed 19 Apr 1995, 15:47 GMT
- Re: hedging: good or bad?,
Abu Rizvi Thu 20 Apr 1995, 14:15 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]