PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: taxes
- Subject: RE: taxes
- From: "Alan G. Isaac" <AISAAC@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 01 Apr 95 13:05:24 EST
This appears to be a fallacy of composition. The question
is whether a consumption tax will successfully tax
_individual_ stocks of wealth. (And in response to Bill,
the reason to do it this way is that I believe people
will be much better at hiding their wealth than in
hiding their consumption.) --Alan G. Isaac
On Sat, 1 Apr 1995 09:33:00 -0700 Bruce McFarling said:
> Both of them [i.e., income and consumption taxes]
>are taxes on income flows, directly or indirectly.
>Estate taxes apply to wealth, for example, but both income and consumption
>taxes can only come from income flows that the taxpayers get their hand on
>one way or another.
>
- Thread context:
- RE: taxes, (continued)
- RE: taxes,
John Gelles Sat 01 Apr 1995, 14:43 GMT
- RE: taxes,
Bruce McFarling Sat 01 Apr 1995, 16:10 GMT
- RE: taxes,
Bruce McFarling Sat 01 Apr 1995, 16:31 GMT
- RE: taxes,
Alan G. Isaac Sat 01 Apr 1995, 17:58 GMT
- RE: taxes,
Alan G. Isaac Sat 01 Apr 1995, 18:05 GMT
- RE: taxes,
Bruce McFarling Sat 01 Apr 1995, 22:43 GMT
- Re: taxes,
LONNIE K. STEVANS Sun 02 Apr 1995, 14:42 GMT
- RE: taxes,
Doug Henwood Sun 02 Apr 1995, 20:32 GMT
- RE: taxes,
Doug Henwood Sun 02 Apr 1995, 20:32 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]