PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: taxes
- Subject: RE: taxes
- From: "Alan G. Isaac" <AISAAC@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 01 Apr 95 12:58:02 EST
Doug, I don't understand you here. Once we grant the
desirability of taxing wealth, why should we care whether
the wealth holder is doing a good job or not of
maintaining it? Further, current arrangements allow
taxes to be postponed (even indefinitely and inter-
generationally) on capital gains. A person selling
losing stocks out of a large portfolio may in fact
be making out like a bandit. --Alan G. Isaac
On Sat, 1 Apr 1995 06:56:36 -0700 Doug Henwood said:
>Even I would find it hard to defend the principle of taxing a losing
>investment. And if it's only a modest gainer, then that income would be
>taxed.
- Thread context:
- RE: taxes, (continued)
- RE: taxes,
Doug Henwood Sat 01 Apr 1995, 13:28 GMT
- RE: taxes,
John Gelles Sat 01 Apr 1995, 14:43 GMT
- RE: taxes,
Bruce McFarling Sat 01 Apr 1995, 16:10 GMT
- RE: taxes,
Bruce McFarling Sat 01 Apr 1995, 16:31 GMT
- RE: taxes,
Alan G. Isaac Sat 01 Apr 1995, 17:58 GMT
- RE: taxes,
Alan G. Isaac Sat 01 Apr 1995, 18:05 GMT
- RE: taxes,
Bruce McFarling Sat 01 Apr 1995, 22:43 GMT
- Re: taxes,
LONNIE K. STEVANS Sun 02 Apr 1995, 14:42 GMT
- RE: taxes,
Doug Henwood Sun 02 Apr 1995, 20:32 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]