PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: Son of unit roots -Reply -Reply -Reply -Reply
Louis-Philippe,
I let Paul answer for himself, but how can you have deductive reasoning
without at least some implicit axioms? And at least in his message to
me on methodology Paul made it very clear that PK theory should use
both deductive and inductive.
-Ric Holt
e-mail holtri@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread context:
- Re: Son of unit roots -Reply -Reply, (continued)
- Re: Son of unit roots -Reply -Reply,
Paul Davidson Sun 12 Feb 1995, 12:11 GMT
- Son of unit roots -Reply -Reply -Reply -Reply,
Louis-Phillippe Rochon Mon 13 Feb 1995, 16:50 GMT
- Son of unit roots -Reply -Reply -Reply -Reply,
Louis-Phillippe Rochon Mon 13 Feb 1995, 17:12 GMT
- Son of unit roots -Reply -Reply -Reply -Reply,
Louis-Phillippe Rochon Mon 13 Feb 1995, 17:15 GMT
- RE: Son of unit roots -Reply -Reply -Reply -Reply,
RICHARD P.F. HOLT Mon 13 Feb 1995, 17:43 GMT
- RE: Son of unit roots -Reply -Reply -Reply -Reply,
GREG RANSOM Mon 13 Feb 1995, 19:28 GMT
- RE: Son of unit roots -Reply -Reply -Reply -Reply,
John Gelles Mon 13 Feb 1995, 22:08 GMT
- Re: Son of unit roots -Reply -Reply -Reply -Reply,
Ted Winslow Mon 13 Feb 1995, 22:58 GMT
- RE: Son of unit roots -Reply -Reply -Reply -Reply -Reply,
Paul Davidson Tue 14 Feb 1995, 14:07 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]