PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: On Utility Theory
Herb,
I think this is a hard question, but roughly we should use our
own _judgment_. I am not at all suggesting that we stop making
welfare judgments (even if we could), but I do find it
questionable whether utility theory helps us do this.
I'm open to discussion however. Can you suggest an
interesting example?
As an example of how one would assess "alternative
economic configurations" in the large, an example
that doesn't rely on utility theory is found in
John Rawls's writing. In the small, I think the
usual focus is on net wealth creation (in the guise
of cost benefit analysis) coupled with taste-driven
talk about transfers. But I won't be sure if any of
this responds to your question until I see an example
of how you think utility theory is useful for this
purpose.
--Alan
On Tue, 15 Nov 1994 05:51:44 -0700 Herbert Gintis said:
> We make welfare judgements all the time. It's okay for a
>philosopher or a coal miner to just reject it. But what am I supposed
>to do? Just shut up when it comes to assessing alternative economic
>configurations? Use my own preferences?
- Thread context:
- Re: On Utility Theory, (continued)
- Re: On Utility Theory,
Alan G. Isaac Mon 14 Nov 1994, 20:45 GMT
- Re: On Utility Theory,
Ted Winslow Wed 16 Nov 1994, 00:59 GMT
- Re: On Utility Theory,
Alan G. Isaac Thu 17 Nov 1994, 02:49 GMT
- Re: On Utility Theory,
A. Allan Schmid Thu 17 Nov 1994, 14:58 GMT
- Re: On Utility Theory,
Alan G. Isaac Thu 17 Nov 1994, 20:17 GMT
- FED-UP!,
Chris Bohner Sat 12 Nov 1994, 21:28 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]