Re: What-if scenarios

Subject: Re: What-if scenarios
From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 1994 11:36:09 -0400 (EDT)

All that military spending is an investment. Its dividend is the
maintenance of a marvellous social hierarchy, globally and within the
rich countries themselves. How could Melman et al conceive of this as a
waste? Especially if you can offload these faux frais onto the taxpaying
middle and working classes.

Doug

Doug Henwood [dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)

Prev by Date: Re: What-if scenarios 11 Jul 1994 12:08:06 -0600 from <dcosta@u.washington.edu>
Next by Date: Re: military spending as investment
Previous by thread: Re: What-if scenarios
Next by thread: Re: What-if scenarios 08 Jul 1994 16:03:00 -0600 from <6155GUASTELL@vmsa.csd.mu.edu>
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: What-if scenarios, (continued)
  - Re: What-if scenarios, Doug Henwood Sat 09 Jul 1994, 18:07 GMT
  - Re: What-if scenarios, 6155GUASTELL Sat 09 Jul 1994, 21:25 GMT
  - Re: What-if scenarios, FAC_BROSSER Mon 11 Jul 1994, 17:28 GMT
  - Re: What-if scenarios, Anthony D'Costa Mon 11 Jul 1994, 18:01 GMT
  - Re: What-if scenarios, Doug Henwood Thu 14 Jul 1994, 15:36 GMT
- Re: Fed and the former axis powers, BMCFARLING Fri 08 Jul 1994, 16:09 GMT
- Re: the Fed and NPR 07 Jul 1994 19:48:40 -0600 from <lwray@diana.cair.du.edu>, Jim Devine Fri 08 Jul 1994, 15:53 GMT
- Polemic/never land, 6155GUASTELL Thu 07 Jul 1994, 18:50 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: Polemic/never land, Randy Wray Fri 08 Jul 1994, 02:13 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]