PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Richard Goodwin
Because of good advise over this network about Richard Goodwin I've
started to read some of his writings. Recently I came across this statement
he made which I'm not quite sure I'm understanding him correctly:
He said, " [I] became convinced that trade cycles are not the result of
mismanagement by the monetary authorities ( a common opinion then, as it
is again now) simply because money supply responds endogenously to business
conditions rather than vice versa." It might be true that money supply or the
Fed responds to endogenous business conditions but if the Fed is *mismanaged*.
In other words led by an ideologue or misreads the business conditions then
it seems to me that monetary authorities can carry out policies that can have
an adverse effect on trade cycles. Am I missing the point that Goodwin is
making here?
-Ric Holt
- Thread context:
- Re: Marshall and Pigou, (continued)
- Conference Canadian Labour 1944-1994,
RICHARD P.F. HOLT Sat 09 Apr 1994, 20:23 GMT
- monthly reminder,
Ric Holt Sat 09 Apr 1994, 11:00 GMT
- Contingent val. / Equity,
Michael KOSZ Thu 07 Apr 1994, 07:26 GMT
- Richard Goodwin,
RICHARD P.F. HOLT Wed 06 Apr 1994, 18:50 GMT
- general models,
ECWFM Wed 06 Apr 1994, 01:38 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]