PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Why economists do not care about high rates of unemployment w
Paul,
There are lots of different kinds of nonlinearity and I
think Bill Mitchell's comment did a good job of elucidating some
of the varieties.
The GT does what you say it does, but New Classicals will
not be convinced because they will sneer about "ad hocracy" of
non-rational expectations. Thus showing them their story does
not hold with their assumptions in a more general model (yes, I
do think the linear unique equilibrium GT case is the special case)
is more polemically and heuristically effective.
Barkley Rosser
JMU
- Thread context:
- Re: Why economists do not care about high rates of unemployment w, (continued)
- Re: Why economists do not care about high rates of unemployment w,
Paul Davidson Tue 05 Apr 1994, 01:24 GMT
- Re: Why economists do not care about high rates of unemployment w,
Paul Davidson Tue 05 Apr 1994, 06:26 GMT
- Re: Why economists do not care about high rates of unemployment w,
FAC_BROSSER Tue 05 Apr 1994, 16:44 GMT
- Re: Why economists do not care about high rates of unemployment w,
Paul Davidson Wed 06 Apr 1994, 03:14 GMT
- Re: Why economists do not care about high rates of unemployment w,
FAC_BROSSER Wed 06 Apr 1994, 18:04 GMT
- Re: Why economists do not care about high rates of unemployment w,
Paul Davidson Thu 07 Apr 1994, 00:37 GMT
- Re: Why economists do not care about high rates of unemployment w,
Steve . Keen Thu 07 Apr 1994, 11:03 GMT
- Re: Why economists do not care about high rates of unemployment w,
Paul Davidson Thu 07 Apr 1994, 16:25 GMT
- Re: Why economists do not care about high rates of unemployment w,
Steve . Keen Thu 07 Apr 1994, 21:01 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]