Re: Why economists do not care about high rates of unemployment w

To: pkt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Why economists do not care about high rates of unemployment w
From: FAC_BROSSER@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 1994 11:05:59 -0500 (EST)

Paul,
     Far be it for me to claim "nonlinearities are well-behaved"
or "desirable equilibria are stable" and I most certainly did not
do so.  All the more reason why it may be necessary for governments
to intervene to PUSH (if possible) economies towards more desirable
equilibria and to KEEP PUSHING in order to keep them there!
Barkley Rosser
James Madison Unversity

Prev by Date: monthly report
Next by Date: Visiting Position Sought by Prof. Ramprasad Sengupta (fwd)
Previous by thread: monthly report
Next by thread: Re: Why economists do not care about high rates of unemployment w
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: general models, (continued)
  - Re: general models, FAC_BROSSER Wed 06 Apr 1994, 21:40 GMT
  - Re: general models, ECWFM Thu 07 Apr 1994, 05:26 GMT
- single-payer health plan, Jim Devine Tue 05 Apr 1994, 10:14 GMT
- Visiting Position Sought by Prof. Ramprasad Sengupta (fwd), Anthony D'Costa Fri 01 Apr 1994, 21:00 GMT
- Re: Why economists do not care about high rates of unemployment w, FAC_BROSSER Fri 01 Apr 1994, 16:07 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: Why economists do not care about high rates of unemployment w, Steve . Keen Fri 01 Apr 1994, 21:25 GMT
  - Re: Why economists do not care about high rates of unemployment w, Paul Davidson Sat 02 Apr 1994, 14:41 GMT
  - Re: Why economists do not care about high rates of unemployment w, Steve . Keen Sun 03 Apr 1994, 02:30 GMT
  - Re: Why economists do not care about high rates of unemployment w, Steve . Keen Sun 03 Apr 1994, 02:32 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]