PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Participatory Planning
two points on Allin's last posting:
the first one is a general point that is often forgotten. Capitalism --
or at least competitive capitalism -- is very good at innovation. But
innovation isn't always a good thing. E.g., nuclear power plants or
new pesticides. Perhaps people disagree about these examples, but
from almost any political point of view, there are examples where
the new is not the same as the good. And innovation simply means
new products and processes.
Specific to Allin's comments: Karl Marx had a strong critique of
the idea of "labor tokens" (as proposed by Proudhon, I believe).
For Marx, the value created by labor could not be determined
ex ante, since it depends on such things as the demand for the
product of labor. I won't extend my summary. I'm simply asking:
have you taken Marx's critique into account?
sincerely,
Jim Devine BITNET: jndf@lmuacad INTERNET: jdevine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Econ. Dept., Loyola Marymount Univ., Los Angeles, CA 90045-2699 USA
310/338-2948 (off); 310/202-6546 (hm); FAX: 310/338-1950
- Thread context:
- Re: Participatory Planning, (continued)
- Re: Participatory Planning,
Trond Andresen Fri 04 Mar 1994, 12:52 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
FAC_BROSSER Fri 04 Mar 1994, 17:47 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
FAC_BROSSER Fri 04 Mar 1994, 17:58 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
FAC_BROSSER Fri 04 Mar 1994, 18:05 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
Jim Devine Fri 04 Mar 1994, 19:22 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
Jim Devine Fri 04 Mar 1994, 19:31 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
Allin Cottrell Fri 04 Mar 1994, 19:45 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
Bill Brown 465-6423/789-2448 Sat 05 Mar 1994, 02:57 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
HERBERT GINTIS Sat 05 Mar 1994, 11:28 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]