PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Participatory Planning
On Thu, 3 Mar 1994, Jim Devine wrote:
> BTW, isn't the giant bell a simple result to deranged incentives?
> i.e., the planners decided that the output of bells would be measured
> in tons?
>
No. Barkley's whole point was that the giant bell was a product of
the Czarist era, and that Russian "gigantomania" predates the Soviet
period. I think he's right on that. I will reply to some of the
more substantive points once I've finished grading midterm exams!
==========================
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
cottrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(910) 759-5762
==========================
- Thread context:
- Re: Participatory Planning, (continued)
- Re: Participatory Planning,
HERBERT GINTIS Thu 03 Mar 1994, 21:04 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
S8800034 Thu 03 Mar 1994, 21:38 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
FAC_BROSSER Thu 03 Mar 1994, 22:12 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
Jim Devine Thu 03 Mar 1994, 22:40 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
Allin Cottrell Fri 04 Mar 1994, 03:13 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
Allin Cottrell Fri 04 Mar 1994, 04:43 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
Trond Andresen Fri 04 Mar 1994, 09:44 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
wpc Fri 04 Mar 1994, 12:22 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
Trond Andresen Fri 04 Mar 1994, 12:52 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]