PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Participatory Planning
Response to Mark Knell:
Hayek certainly did pinpoint certain serious problems with
command socialist central planning. But in a nonlinear dynamic
world of multiple equilibria (am I broken record or what?), his
evolutionarily self-organizing markets may be distinctly sub-
optimal by any measure, and not immune from "coordination failures,"
indeed are wide open to them.
This remains the argument for _some_ kind of planning, whether
of the Cockshott-Cottrell participatory kind, or some more general
macro steering, or of investment, specifically of infrastructure or
in a more detailed manner. There is no easy out here, as the
breakdowns and confusion in the "post-socialist" world show. In my
opinion, Hayek "checked out" right at the moment of his "ideological
triumph" and before its hollowness would be fully revealed.
Barkley Rosser
James Madison University
PS: We are in the midst of two foot snowstorm here (2/3 of a meter)
in the Shenandoah Valley, putting us ahead of Vermont as well as
Australia. Everything is shut down for the nth time this winter.
- Thread context:
- Re: Participatory Planning,
FAC_BROSSER Tue 01 Mar 1994, 22:47 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Participatory Planning,
Mark S. Knell Wed 02 Mar 1994, 02:39 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
Mark S. Knell Wed 02 Mar 1994, 02:59 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
HERBERT GINTIS Wed 02 Mar 1994, 12:35 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
FAC_BROSSER Wed 02 Mar 1994, 19:28 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
S8800034 Wed 02 Mar 1994, 21:58 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
S8800034 Wed 02 Mar 1994, 22:18 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
FAC_BROSSER Wed 02 Mar 1994, 22:49 GMT
- Re: Participatory Planning,
HERBERT GINTIS Thu 03 Mar 1994, 06:14 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]