PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Colander and New Keynesian Economics
A further defense of NK, especially the Nonlinear Variety:
In an earlier note I conceded the "irrelevance" of the
Grandmont real balances model in an uncertain universe. The
real point, however, is that he showed that even if one starts
with perfect foresight one can get chaotic dynamics with
nonlinearity. In such a situation the perfect foresight assumption
becomes negated. In short, nonlinearity becomes a powerful
underpinning for the problem of fundamental uncertainty, more
powerful than simply citing Keynes whom, as we have noticed, is
not universally respected, and even where he is must be observed
to have sometimes contradicted himself (like Marx, the Bible, etc.)
Barkley Rosser
JMU
- Thread context:
- Re: Colander and New Keynesian Economics, (continued)
- Re: Colander and New Keynesian Economics,
Name withheld by request Wed 26 Jan 1994, 11:56 GMT
- Re: Colander and New Keynesian Economics,
Paul Davidson Wed 26 Jan 1994, 15:20 GMT
- Re: Colander and New Keynesian Economics,
roy rotheim Wed 26 Jan 1994, 15:50 GMT
- Re: Colander and New Keynesian Economics,
FAC_BROSSER Wed 26 Jan 1994, 16:22 GMT
- Re: Colander and New Keynesian Economics,
FAC_BROSSER Thu 27 Jan 1994, 18:19 GMT
- Re: Colander and New Keynesian Economics,
Paul Davidson Fri 28 Jan 1994, 11:39 GMT
- Re: Colander and New Keynesian Economics,
FAC_BROSSER Sun 30 Jan 1994, 21:26 GMT
- Re: Colander and New Keynesian Economics,
Paul Davidson Mon 31 Jan 1994, 10:20 GMT
- Re: Colander and New Keynesian Economics,
FAC_BROSSER Mon 31 Jan 1994, 20:41 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]