PKT
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Minsky, FIH, and stability
Your point is made, Paul. We were just using different notions of the
word "general". As you have explained it in your last posting, it
menas something like "with the least divergence from accepted axuioms"
or "with the minimum number of axiuoms". My generality related to
the area of relations between variables, where "in general" most
relationships are not linear.
Cheers,
Steve Keen
- Thread context:
- Re: Minsky, FIH, and stability, (continued)
- Re: Minsky, FIH, and stability,
Doug Henwood Sun 23 Jan 1994, 17:07 GMT
- Re: Minsky, FIH, and stability,
Paul Davidson Tue 25 Jan 1994, 15:50 GMT
- Re: Minsky, FIH, and stability,
Paul Davidson Tue 25 Jan 1994, 15:53 GMT
- Re: Minsky, FIH, and stability,
Paul Davidson Tue 25 Jan 1994, 16:09 GMT
- Re: Minsky, FIH, and stability,
Steve . Keen Tue 25 Jan 1994, 22:11 GMT
- Re: Minsky, FIH, and stability,
Paul Davidson Wed 26 Jan 1994, 15:40 GMT
- Re: Minsky, FIH, and stability,
Paul Davidson Wed 26 Jan 1994, 15:47 GMT
- Re: Minsky, FIH, and stability,
FAC_BROSSER Wed 26 Jan 1994, 16:13 GMT
- Re: Minsky, FIH, and stability,
FAC_BROSSER Wed 26 Jan 1994, 18:36 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]